PixelOS

(pixelos.net)

46 points | by emilburzo 3 hours ago

9 comments

  • Fred27 51 minutes ago
    I struggled to work out what it was for and why I might want to install it on my Pixel 10 Fold - until it I went to the download page and dawned on me that it's to make non-Pixel phones look like Pixel ones.

    It might be worth mentioning the whole reason for this to exist on the site somewhere.

    • pdrmky 48 minutes ago
      "PixelOS is an AOSP based ROM, with Google apps included and all Pixel goodies. We aim to provide an experience similar to Google Pixel phones with numerous performance enhancements and a small amount of useful additional features."

      Was this not on the front page when you looked?

      • boomlinde 44 minutes ago
        Yes, but it doesn't really make that clear. I first thought that it was a replacement OS for Google Pixel phone which replicates the functionality of the original OS but adds enhancements and features.
        • pdrmky 27 minutes ago
          Fair. I got to the "experience similar to Google Pixel phones" bit and thought well I've already got a pixel so I don't need this, but I see your point about the extras.
      • avhception 12 minutes ago
        This is exactly what was on the front page when I looked, and I was confused as well. I own a Pixel device and have replaced the original OS with Lineage in order to get rid of some of Googles more aggressive behavior, like pushing Google Wallet in front of my face through notifications. I thought the intention for this ROM might be to get back some of the original Pixel OS functionality.
      • Lerc 43 minutes ago
        At no point do they specify for whom they intend to provide this experience.
        • pdrmky 24 minutes ago
          I read it as people who don't already have pixel phones, but clearly a lot of other people aren't, so they might need to be more explicit.
  • forgotpwd16 15 minutes ago
    Came across it recently, like a week ago, while looking whether my phone has any custom ROMs. Cool but worth noting it's quite in legal gray area. Pixel is trademarked by Google & bundling GApps requires* MADA license from Google & takes* actions to bypass Play Integrity.

    *It's why more known custom ROMs (LOs & crDroid) are distributed without GApps.

    **Something certainly great for its users but creates risk for a backlash against custom OSes.

  • petargyurov 1 hour ago
    Practically nothing useful on the About page. Can anyone chime in what this is exactly?
    • whyredfire 1 hour ago
      one of the devs here, and yeah fair, the about page says nothing. it's a custom rom that makes non-pixel phones run like a pixel: aosp + gapps + the pixel exclusive features

      put simpler, this replaces the stock android your manufacturer ships

      • mdp2021 28 minutes ago
        How does the project position in privacy?
      • jnkl 54 minutes ago
        Has the project any affiliation with Google?
        • whyredfire 50 minutes ago
          Nope, no affiliation at all, we're an independent community project. If anything, google makes life harder for us lol, play integrity is a constant cat and mouse thing for every custom rom
          • brnt 42 minutes ago
            What changes do you make to improve Play Integrity?
        • rc1 51 minutes ago
          [flagged]
      • ollybee 51 minutes ago
        what are some pixel exclusive features ?
        • whyredfire 38 minutes ago
          pixel launcher, at a glance, circle to search, the pixel wallpapers and theming plus a bunch of small stuff like the fonts, icons, boot animation etc
  • chrysoprace 1 hour ago
    So I guess the point of this is to provide a Pixel-like experience to non-Pixel phones? It's a cool idea but I think I'll personally stick with GrapheneOS for my next phone.
  • sergdigon 28 minutes ago
    The idea is cool but as some pointed out the "About" page could be a bit more informative on what the rom contains (e.g. what is included, what is planned to be included, what are the limitations etc)

    Also there are a lot of devices listed on the website but if you look a bit closer on the website you realize half of them are discontinued (38 active and 44 discontinued to be precise). I did some quick scrapping and this is the current status per brand:

    Asus: 2/2 active (100%)

    Nothing: 1/1 active (100%)

    OnePlus: 8/10 active (80%)

    Motorola: 4/5 active (80%)

    Sony: 2/3 active (67%)

    Realme: 5/10 active (50%)

    Xiaomi: 16/33 active (48%)

    Samsung: 0/12 active (0%)

    Google: 0/4 active (0%)

    10or: 0/1 active (0%)

    Micromax: 0/1 active (0%)

    Total: 38/82 active (46%)

    Maybe it would make more sense to try to focus on one or two brands instead of trying to do all of them (at least at this stage)

  • SilverSlash 33 minutes ago
    Err...surely Google is going to sue? Can someone tell me how this is legal?
  • rustyhancock 25 minutes ago
    I think this is a bad name for the project if they don't want heat from Google.
  • coolness 1 hour ago
    There is no way Google will let this live right?
    • qmarchi 1 hour ago
      Project has been around for a while, so it's got some resiliency built in.
    • the4anoni 1 hour ago
      Such projects existed for long time, I think Pixel Experience ROM was first.
    • teekert 1 hour ago
      Or it's an uphill battle (which is still being fought relatively well imho), like with GrapheneOS.
    • benrutter 28 minutes ago
      I don't know that they'll care too much - how many people seriously install custom roms on their phone? I'm one of them, and I'm sure there are dozens of us, but probably not enough to make an impact on google's bottom line.
    • ForHackernews 16 minutes ago
      Why would Google be against more people installing their adware?
    • IshKebab 33 minutes ago
      Only as long as it stays irrelevant. I find it amusing they have a "legal" page.
    • preisschild 1 hour ago
      It sounds like they include all the Google Spyware anyways, so I doubt they have a problem with that...
  • xx_ns 1 hour ago
    It's always surprising how many people who like to tinker with their devices also deliberately want to tie themselves more into the Google ecosystem. I would've guessed that the Venn diagram of these two types of people wouldn't have much overlap, but the ROM's popularity kind of speaks for itself.
    • eadmund 57 minutes ago
      > It's always surprising how many people who like to tinker with their devices also deliberately want to tie themselves more into the Google ecosystem.

      I don’t believe that there’s a realistic alternative. The Apple ecosystem is even more restrictive, while even in 2026 the non-Android Linux phone market appears to still be pretty uncompelling.

      • xx_ns 54 minutes ago
        I meant more like installing LineageOS (which exists for most of the devices that PixelOS is ported for) and managing Google apps yourself - whether just installing a regular minimal GApps, or using MicroG. PixelOS is like a "give me Google everything" nuclear option.
    • mschuster91 30 minutes ago
      Simple: Pure AOSP without Google Play Services is garbage as quite a lot of apps openly rely on it and the built-in core apps (phone, messages, ...) haven't been maintained in a while. Most manufacturers (cough Samsung) insist on loading their Android with bloatware. Google's Pixel has barely any bloatware, but polished core apps.
    • preisschild 1 hour ago
      Tbf I (degoogled Graphene/ex-LOS user for more than a decade) can definitely see why you would rather have the mostly-AOSP-native Pixel experience on your smartphones than completely enshittified UIs that Samsung or Huawei provide...
      • hurfdurf 45 minutes ago

          mostly-AOSP-native Pixel experience 
        
        Pixel is as far away from AOSP as any other Android OEM.
    • Zetobal 1 hour ago
      [dead]