10 comments

  • phyzome 1 hour ago
    Existing, probably less sketchy app: https://github.com/yjeanrenaud/yj_nearbyglasses (as linked in the other thread)
  • drbojingle 9 minutes ago
    Zucker no zucking, Zucker no zucking, Zucker no zucking! We did it, we stopped Zucker!
  • pluc 2 hours ago
  • world2vec 22 minutes ago
    In the novel "The Mountain in the Sea" (great read, very pertinent as well for the discussion of AGI and what is consciousness), an "abglanz" is like a digital identity shield that hides a person's face behind a shifting weird pattern of colours. I wonder how far off we are from everyone just retreating into higher privacy settings and opt out.
  • Singletail 1 hour ago
    It only works while the glasses are in pairing mode. This is useless.
    • micromacrofoot 1 hour ago
      I'm not sure why you think that, bluetooth devices often broadcast their presence even when not in pairing mode

      it's even on the site

      > Most pairs keep advertising while worn, so you can usually hear them, but a few standalone models stay silent.

      • tonyhart7 48 minutes ago
        isn't this security flaw ????
        • Saris 21 minutes ago
          Probably, it's how bluetooth is used to track devices/people too.
  • solenoid0937 8 minutes ago
    These glasses are amazing for capturing memories on vacations, way nicer than using my phone camera.
    • gspr 6 minutes ago
      How convenient, so to hell with the privacy of everyone around you then.
      • solenoid0937 5 minutes ago
        There's a bright blinking light on my face telling them they're being recorded - and they have their phones out and are recording anyways! There are a lot of assumptions baked into your comment.

        What's with HN becoming so saturated with snarky cynical one line quips? I don't think I've ever seen a worse comment section.

  • lordnacho 44 minutes ago
    Why do any of the device's network connections (WiFi/BT/etc) need to be on? What's to stop someone recording and uploading later?
  • cubefox 2 hours ago
    From https://about.fb.com/news/2026/07/metas-ai-glasses-your-ques...

    > Can’t people just cover up or disable the LED?

    > The camera is disabled when people try to do this. Beginning with our second generation of glasses, the camera is automatically disabled if we detect that the capture LED has been blocked. No photos or videos can be taken until we detect that the light is unblocked.

    > Since the introduction of this safeguard, we’ve seen some people go beyond using tape to sophisticated efforts to modify or destroy the capture LED. We are continuously improving our ability to detect tampering, and now we’re updating the glasses to disable the camera if they detect the LED was physically tampered with or destroyed. No other kind of camera has done this and we’re proud to lead the industry forward.

    • bko 56 minutes ago
      I think you're asking too much of a publication to do this kind of investigative reporting.

      Their job is to scan the app store for any app that is anti-tech and has at least 1k downloads and write an article about how there's huge backlash.

      • bonsai_bar 13 minutes ago
        This is Wired, not some random substack. What a lazy, cynical comment.
    • ourmandave 1 hour ago
      Or someone can just turn off updates and never download the patch.
      • chmod775 1 hour ago
        It's a meta product. Safe to assume that sooner or later it will be unusable unless you install the latest update so it can continue phoning home.
    • magicalist 1 hour ago
      > Since the introduction of this safeguard, we’ve seen some people go beyond using tape to sophisticated efforts to modify or destroy the capture LED. We are continuously improving our ability to detect tampering, and now we’re updating the glasses to disable the camera if they detect the LED was physically tampered with or destroyed. No other kind of camera has done this and we’re proud to lead the industry forward.

      Yes it's true people have figured out how to disable the safeguard, but we all agree the important thing as we try to sell millions more of these is that we tried, right?

      • solenoid0937 33 minutes ago
        Seeing these reactionary Reddit-like takes on HN sucks. No, it's not easy for the average person to disable the camera on these glasses. They do continuously make it harder to do so. At this point anyone interested in spy glasses is better off buying one of the many other glasses with cameras in it.
    • blondie9x 2 hours ago
      The problem is the LED isn’t enabled currently when live streaming content to Instagram or Facebook. Most live streams can just be captured and recorded by someone else. This is a huge cap in privacy and safety even if the LED was fully functional without tampering.
  • shevy-java 1 hour ago
    The Spy Glasses need to be abolished everywhere.

    I was, however had, quite surprised when I saw them used by "auditors" (here, I refer to e. g. "auditors" on youtube specifically). Now this brought a problem for me, because auditors on the one hand, bring interesting encounters, even if they (or some of them) meta-jabait and provoke (again, only some of them at best, in many cases they don't really). But when they use spy glasses to serve greedy mega-corporations, this totally shifts the whole "audit" instantly, because then they also support evil Facebook, Google or what not. And that kind of runs counter to the whole audit-idea. So far I only saw one use the facebook spy glasses, but I wonder whether he even gave any thought to this. I understand why he uses spy glasses, but I don't understand why he does it to benefit Facebook. That IMO puts the whole idea behind audits instantly in a wrong angle. I haven't seen others use it, so perhaps it just was one or few, but they don't seem to really think anymore. Some audit channels were also censored by Google in the last weeks, others were not, but this just amplifies the whole problem here. Imagine if the spy glasses were made by Google. And the auditors depend on Google money. It's really strange. The whole setup does not work well. I understand that they want to make money, but why would I want to support facebook-agents using spy glasses at all? That makes no sense, so I decided when an audit-channel uses facebook spy glasses or anyone else's corporations spy-glasses, I won't watch anything from there. Same with AI content - anyone using AI content I instantly add to a perma-ban list. I recently saw more and more people use AI slop images and AI filters. This is soooooo horrible. These people don't seem to understand that AI slop kills interest. Yet some swear by it - it is fascinating. Those who use AI slop, can not be convinced that using AI slop is detrimental. They have been converted into AI skynet servants.

  • krautburglar 1 hour ago
    A better solution would be to beat up people who wear such things. Just an idea.
    • countsarabasa 7 minutes ago
      Turns out assault and/or battery are already very much illegal too and suspecting someone is a wanker isn’t on the list of things that get you out of a charge.

      Wouldn’t recommend unless you really, really like nutraloaf

    • DaSHacka 46 minutes ago
      The difference is using an app to detect hidden camera glasses is legal while beating the shit out of random people on the street is not lol
    • redsocksfan45 8 minutes ago
      [dead]